Red won

The bot tried all 126 ways to split these ten into two teams of five. For each one it put everyone in their best lane and scored it: the rating gap between the teams, plus a cost for every player off their main role (bigger if they were filled recently), plus a nudge against repeating last game's teams or putting last game's teammates back together. Lowest score wins. Here are its top three:

1. #1In playBlue 51% · 49% Red

   Rating gap

   14 pts

   Off main role

   2

   These teams.

2. #1Blue 51% · 49% Red

   Rating gap

   14 pts

   Off main role

   2

   Rerolled past this one.

3. #2Blue 50% · 50% Red

   Rating gap

   57 pts

   Off main role

   2

   Reshuffles 4 players.

   Closer odds, but ranked lower: a bigger rating gap (57 vs 14 pts).

4. #2Blue 50% · 50% Red

   Rating gap

   57 pts

   Off main role

   2

   Reshuffles 4 players.

   Closer odds, but ranked lower: a bigger rating gap (57 vs 14 pts).

5. #3Blue 51% · 49% Red

   Rating gap

   18 pts

   Off main role

   2

   Reshuffles 4 players.

   Ranked lower: a bigger rating gap (18 vs 14 pts).

6. #3Blue 51% · 49% Red

   Rating gap

   18 pts

   Off main role

   2

   Reshuffles 4 players.

   Ranked lower: a bigger rating gap (18 vs 14 pts).

Why win chance and rating gap can disagreeWin chance comes from everyone's Rating as it is. The rating gap is what the bot balances on, and it counts anyone off their main role as a bit weaker there, so the two can point slightly different ways.

Nobody picked these teams.Admins can set the mode and whether a game is rated, but only before its teams are rolled. Then they can tap Roll teams and Reroll (which moves to the next pick on this list), and nothing else. Nobody can hand-edit a rating; ratings only move when a game ends.

The bot's note: Blue favored 51%. 2 off-role: 1sec Reloading at mid, Ramzyinhović at mid. Gap 14. Next best: 2 swaps, gap 57.

Not enough games yet to check the bot's odds (0 of 20).